CIHS – Centre for Integrated and Holistic Studies

Date/Time:

Godhra Massacre: A Dark Reminder of Terror and Brutality

Godhra Massacre: A Dark Reminder of Terror and Brutality

Pummy Pandita There are wounds that never go away, and some scars that don’t fade. One such terrible incident was the Godhra Massacre on February 27, 2002, when 59 defenceless Karsevaks, including women and children, were burned alive inside a locked train compartment in a planned, heartless attack. It was not a riot nor an accident but a calculated act of horror, carefully planned to convey a terrifying message. The attack, far from impromptu, was a carefully thought-out act of terror. Hundreds of Karsevaks, who had gone to pray at the Ram Janmabhoomi site in Ayodhya, were returning by Sabarmati Express. The train, which was forcibly stopped using emergency brakes, came to a halt at Phalia signal, located inside a Muslim slum that covered both sides of the railway track, was attacked by a crowd of more than a thousand people, armed with gasoline, acid bulbs, and iron rods, launched a coordinated attack shouting “Maro, Kapo (kato), Badhane Jalavi Do (Burn them all)”. They doused the coaches with flammable liquid and set them on fire, transforming the train into a death chamber. Heart chilling cries of children, mothers clinging desperately to their newborns, and old pilgrims made fruitless attempts to flee within that flaming compartment, but were all engulfed by the flames. In the most horrifying manner conceivable, bodies were mashed together and burned beyond recognition. A deliberate attempt was made to skew the facts even before the fire had subsided. For years, radicals and vested interests tried to push this atrocity under the carpet by claiming it was a “spontaneous reaction” or a “accident.” It was, however, clear from forensic evidence, eyewitness reports, and judicial investigations that the fire was set on purpose from outside. The attack was confirmed to have been meticulously planned and carried out after the Nanavati Commission and judicial processes rejected the accident argument. However, the burned remains of those defenceless Karsevaks—including small children who were burnt to ashes—tell a different tale, one of hate-fueled violence that is frequently attempted to be distorted by mainstream narratives. It was only after years of legal fight that 31 persons were found guilty by a special court, making them accountable for the devastation. The verdict recognised that the massacre was not an unplanned outburst but rather a deliberate act of communal violence. Many important masterminds and instigators, meanwhile, have not been held accountable. However, some fundamental questions remain: The Godhra Massacre is not just a chapter in history but a warning too. A cautionary tale on the perils of narrative manipulation, organised violence, and radicalisation. Society as a whole is put in danger when innocent individuals are killed for their convictions, truth is censored for political reasons, or justice is postponed or refused. There are people even today who still want to change history to hide the terrible events of that tragic morning. In the hearts of the families who lost loved ones, in the burned remnants of Coaches S-6 and S-7, and in the conscience of a country that will never forget, however, the truth endures. After 23 years of the massacre, cries for justice, remembrance, and the preservation of the truth can be heard from the ashes of those 59 souls.  It is a national wound that must never be forgotten! (Author is head of operations at Centre for Integrated and Holistic Studies, a non-partisan think tank based in New Delhi)

Read More
Keir Starmer Botches by Design

Keir Starmer Botches by Design

United Kingdom’s counter-extremism policy botches up by intent. It’s a political weapon against Hindus and offers shield for islamists. Dr. Shailendra Kumar Pathak United Kingdom’s government’s proposed new counter-extremism policy may not be well intentioned. It’s being perhaps calculative and an ideological weapon designed to shield Islamists while turning Hindus scapegoats. UK’s Home Ministry document, ‘Extremely Confused: The government’s new counter-extremism review revealed’, authored by Andrew Gilligan and Dr. Paul Stott for Policy Exchange think tank throws insights into anti-Hindu thinking of Keir Starmer government in London. This policy manipulates language, distorts extremism definitions and provide protective shield to most dangerous groups while targeting those who seek to challenge Islamist and leftist orthodoxy. The report is in itself a response to UK Home Ministry counter-extremism document prepared under the influence of left-wing and Islamist-aligned bureaucrats. Figures such as Sara Khan, Iman Atta and Robin Simcox, known for their self-proclaimed progressive and Islamist-leaning advocacy, have had significant impact on shaping this policy direction. These figures have past associations with organizations that downplay role of Islamist ideology in terrorism and instead push for a “decolonial” or “grievance-based” framework that excuses extremist behaviour. By shifting from an ideology-based to a behaviour-based approach, UK government has removed Islamism from scrutiny, despite its overwhelming role in extremism while falsely constructing a “Hindu nationalist threat” to create moral equivalence where none exists. The report highlights how Islamist terror has been responsible for 94 per cent of terrorism-related deaths in UK since 1999. Yet, the policy assigns vague, neutral labels like “grievance-based extremism” or “online radicalization” to Islamist violence. Instead of acknowledging well-documented role of Islamist ideology in grooming gangs, blasphemy violence and jihadist attacks, the policy frames these acts as “problematic behaviours” detached from ideology. “The Sprint de-centres and downplays ideology in general and Islamism in particular,” the report states, making it clear that the government is deliberately avoiding naming the most pressing extremist threat. This ensures that counter-terror resources are wasted monitoring low-level social grievances while radical mosques and Islamist networks continue operating freely. At the same time, Hindutva and Hindu nationalism are explicitly named as threats—despite no Hindu terror cases in UK. This is a deliberate effort to demonize Hindus, forcing them into a defensive position where any resistance to Islamist aggression is framed as extremism. This distortion is not accidental; it is a product of Left-Islamist alliance. The leftist establishment sees Islamist groups as allies against nationalism, traditional values, and Western identity. By falsely portraying Hindus as aggressors, they create a justification to police and silence Hindu voices. The Leicester riots of 2022 epitomized this dynamic—Islamist mobs attacked Hindu homes, temples and businesses, yet the media and government falsely framed Hindus as the perpetrators. The Policy Exchange report specifically identifies Islamist groups such as Muslim Engagement and Development (MEND) and CAGE as key influencers in shaping this policy direction. Both organizations have a history of defending Islamist extremism, with MEND previously accused of enabling hate speech and CAGE notorious for its support of jihadist figures, including defending ISIS executioner Mohammed Emwazi (“Jihadi John”). CAGE’s leadership has been linked to figures such as Moazzam Begg, who has defended convicted terrorists and consistently opposed counter-terrorism measures aimed at dismantling jihadist networks. New counter-extremism policy ensures that future anti-Hindu violence will be ignored or worse, justified under guise of fighting “Hindutva extremism.” The Policy Exchange report warns, “Expansionary definitions also risk triggering even greater and more distracting political controversy than now, from both right and left,” demonstrating that this shift will not only harm Hindus but weaken counter-extremism efforts altogether. Similarly, Khalistani separatist figures like Avtar Singh Khanda—who played a significant role in radicalizing Sikh youth—are downplayed as mere “diaspora activists.” The policy’s refusal to acknowledge Khalistani terror confirms its politically motivated agenda. How UK’s Counter-Extremism Policy Manipulates Language to Protect Islamists and Target Hindus Group Government Label Real-World Impact Islamists and Jihadists “Grievance-based extremism,” “youth violence,” “online radicalization,” “extreme views” De-ideologizes Islamist violence, making it appear as personal problem rather than a systemic movement Islamic Grooming Gangs “Organized exploitation,” “group-based sexual abuse” Avoids acknowledging religious, ethnic patterns behind these crimes Islamic Blasphemy Extremists (e.g., Batley Grammar incident) “Marginalized voices reacting to offense” Shields Islamic radicalism from accountability, while punishing those who ‘provoke’ them Hindus who defend themselves “Hindu nationalist extremism,” “Hindutva radicalization” Creates false equivalence between Hindu self-defense and Islamist violence Khalistani Extremists “Sikh activism,” “diaspora advocacy” Downplays their links to terrorism, separatist violence Broader objective behind this policy seems to create a permanent mechanism for ideological suppression. By expanding extremism to include vague categories like “misogyny,” “conspiracy theories,” and “online subcultures,” the government has provided itself with a sweeping tool to criminalize dissent. The Policy Exchange report specifically criticizes this shift, saying that “including a range of other crimes and social ills in the remit risks swamping already stretched interveners and counter-terror police with tens, if not hundreds, or thousands of new cases.” This ensures that anyone critical of Islamism, mass immigration or leftist policies can be surveilled and targeted. The reversal of protections against recording “non-crime hate incidents” further exacerbates this problem, allowing police to build unofficial records against individuals who express politically inconvenient views. Meanwhile, Islamists benefit immensely from this shift. By removing ideology from counter-extremism, the government ensures that radical preachers, jihadist recruiters and extremist organizations are treated as victims of social grievances rather than as threats to national security. This will make it even harder for law enforcement to track and dismantle jihadist networks. The rebranding of Islamist extremism as “behavioural concerns” allows Islamists to operate with near impunity while those who challenge them face legal persecution. “The Sprint may have been influenced by the events of Southport,” the report notes, warning that using lone incidents of violence as justification for broad policy shifts risks erasing the real threats posed by ideological extremism. This is not counter-extremism—it is state-sponsored assault on Hindus and a deliberate act of political repression. Instead of drawing comparison to Jewish experience, it is more

Read More
Without Enmity, Let’s Work for Welfare of All

Without Enmity, Let’s Work for Welfare of All

Taking inspiration from Bhagwan Ram, let’s pursue path of harmony, unity, progress and peace; reconstruction of Bharat and entire world. Dr Mohan Bhagwat The history of our Bharat is one of continuous struggle against invaders for around last one and a half thousand years. The aim of early invasions was to plunder and sometimes (like Alexander’s invasion) was for colonisation. But, attacks from West in the name of Islam only brought complete destruction and alienation of the society. To demoralise the nation, society, it was necessary to destroy their religious places, hence foreign invaders destroyed temples in India. They did this not once but multiple times. Their aim was to demoralise Bharatiya society so that they could rule over Bharat unhindered with a weakened society. The demolition of Shri Ram temple in Ayodhya was also done with same intention and for same purpose. This policy of invaders was not limited to just Ayodhya or any one temple, but was a war strategy for the entire world. Indian rulers never attacked anyone, but invaders of the world have done such misdeeds by being aggressive for expansion of their kingdom. But in Bharat, it did not have the desired results, not at least as per their expectations. On the contrary, in Bharat, the faith, commitment and morale of the society never diminished, the society did not bow down, their struggle of resistance continued. Therefore, repeated attempts were made to take control of Shri Ram’s birthplace and build a temple there. There were many wars, struggles and sacrifices for him. And, the issue of Ram Janmabhoomi ingrained in the minds of Hindus. In 1857, when war plans started being made against the foreign i.e. British rule, Hindus and Muslims together expressed their readiness to fight against them and then there was a mutual exchange of ideas between them. And, at that time, a situation evolved where there would be a reconciliation on issue of banning cow slaughter and liberation of Shri Ram Janmabhoomi . Bahadur Shah Zafar also guaranteed a ban on cow slaughter. As a result, entire society fought together. Bharatiya people showed bravery in that war but unfortunately this war of Independence failed. Then, Bharat did not get independence, British rule remained uninterrupted, but the struggle for Ram Temple did not stop. According to British policy of “Divide and Rule” towards Hindu-Muslims which was already in practice, gained even more prominence after 1857. To break the unity, British hanged the heroes of the struggle in Ayodhya and question of liberation of Ram Janmabhoomi remained unresolved. The struggle for Ram temple continued. After Independence in 1947, when Somnath temple was unanimously renovated, the discussion about such temples started. Similar consensus could have been considered regarding liberation of Ram Janmabhoomi, but the direction of politics changed. The selfish forms of politics such as discrimination and appeasement became prevalent and hence the question remained as it is. On this issue, governments did not even consider the wishes and sentiments of Hindu society. On the contrary, they tried to destroy initiative taken by the society. The legal battle related to this, which had been going on since pre-independence, continuously carried on. The mass movement for the liberation of Ram Janmabhoomi began in the 1980s and continued for thirty years. In 1949, the Murty of Bhagwan Shri Ramchandra appeared at the Ram Janmabhoomi. In 1986, the mandir was unlocked as per court order. In the coming period, the continuous struggle of Hindu society continued through many campaigns and kar seva. In 2010, a clear judgement of Allahabad High Court clearly came before the society. The efforts had to be sustained for final resolution of the issue at the earliest. On November 9, 2019, after 134 years of legal struggle, the Supreme Court gave a balanced decision after examining the truth and facts. The feelings and facts of both parties were also considered in this decision. This decision has been given after hearing the arguments of all parties in the court. According to this decision, a board of trustees was constituted for constructing the temple. Bhoomi pujan of the temple took place on August 5, 2020 and now, Paush Shukla Dwadashi Yugabd 5125, accordingly on January 22, 2024, installation and Pran Pratishtha ceremony of the Murty of Shri Ramlala has been organised. From Dharmic point of view, Shri Ram is the most worshipped deity of majority society and the life of Shri Ramchandra is still accepted as an ideal code of conduct by entire society. Hence, now the conflict that has arisen as for and against over the dispute should be ended. The bitterness that has arisen in the meantime should also end. Enlightened people of the society must see that the dispute ends completely. Ayodhya means a city ‘where there is no war ‘, ‘a place free from conflict’. On this occasion, in the entire country, reconstruction of Ayodhya in our mind is the need of the hour and also the duty of all of us. The occasion of construction of Shri Ram mandir in Ayodhya marks reawakening of national pride. This also signifies acceptance of the vision of life behind the character of Shri Ram by modern Bharatiya society. Lord Shri Ram is to be worshiped in the temple with rituals of ‘Patram, Pushpam, Phalam, Toyam’ (leaves, flowers, fruits and water) and at the same time, by establishing image of Shri Ram in our minds, in the light of the same inculcating ideal conduct, we have to worship Shri Ram. As “Shivo Bhootva Shivam Bhajet, Ramo Bhootva Ramam Bhajet” (to worship Shiva, Be Shiva, to worship Ram, be Ram) is called true worship. If we consider from this point of view, then according to the social nature of Bharatiya culture, we need to imbibe “Matravat Pardareshu , Pardravyeshu Loshtvat. Atmavat sarvabhuteshu , yah pasyati sah panditah” (He is a wise man who sees the wives of others as his mother, the wealth of others like clod of earth and all beings as his own

Read More
Amalgamation of Spirituality, Faith, Culture, Unity

Maha Kumbh: Amalgamation of Spirituality, Faith, Culture, Unity

Kumbh Mela derives its name from ancient Sanskrit language. In Sanskrit, mela means fair while Kumbh signifies a pitcher with nectar of immortality. Kumbh Mela is the largest and most significant recurring Hindu pilgrimage event in Bharat. During Kumbh, people from world over converge at holy rivers for a sacred bath to atone for their sins and attain liberation or moksha from all worldly attachments. Kumbh Mela are held at Haridwar in northern hill state of Uttarakhand where the holiest of river Ganges flows from mighty Himalayan ranges; Prayagraj in Uttar Pradesh which sees coming together of Ganges, Yamuna, and Saraswati; Nasik in Maharashtra through which river  Godavari flows and Ujjain in Madhya Pradesh that hosts Shipra river. These locations alternate every twelve years for holding the Kumbh melas. Maha Kumbh denotes largest Hindu spiritual gathering globally and perfectly reflects a healthy mix of community, tradition and commitment. In 2025, Maha Kumbh will take place in Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh during January 14 – February 26. It’s billed as a breathtaking event that will bring tens of millions people from all over world in their pursuit of spiritual enlightenment. One estimate put the gathering at 400 million people that equal almost the entire European Union’s 27-member countries Kumbh Mela transcends religious barriers, considering its historical and cultural significance, representing universal human desire for peace, purification, and unification.

Read More
Ayodhya Overtakes Mecca, Vatican in Footfall

Ayodhya Overtakes Mecca, Vatican in Footfall

One Year after Bhagwan Ram Lalla’s  Pran Pratishta, the holy town holds out hope to be fulcrum of Hindu renaissance. Pummy Pandita Bhagwan Ram’s Pran Pratishta in January 2024 at his very birthplace in Ayodhya marked a new chapter in cultural and spiritual journey of Bharat. Since the construction of magnificent temple as abode of Ram Lalla, Ayodhya has undergone a transformation that devout Hindus connect to in spiritual terms and practicing faith. There’s no denying that Ayodhya, once a neglected, haunted and disconnected small town, is not any of these anymore. It’s bustling with devout people converging to Ayodhya by road, airways and superfast trains’ network. Infrastructure in Ayodhya has also undergone a sea change with roads, waterways and huge tourism circuit with hospitality points coming up in last one year. Footfall in Ayodhya as per estimates has crossed that of Vatican (6.7 Mn in 2023) and Mecca (1.83 Mn in 2024) many times over. As per Hindu calendar, January 11, 2025 marks first anniversary of Prana Pratishtha of Bhagwan Ram Lalla and the day would be celebrated as “Pratishtha Dwadashi” at Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Mandir in Ayodhya. A clutch of religious rites, devotional recitations, cultural acts and spiritual talks will be performed at the sanctum sanctorum and the entire Ayodhya Dham. Over three crore people are expected to witness the grand celebrations of Shri Ram’s Pran Pratishtha anniversary. Spiritual ceremonies will be held at Yajna Mandap, a dedicated location within the Mandir premises at break of dawn to kick off the celebrations. The Agnihotra ceremony involving lighting of fire will take place during 8 am – 11 am and again between 2 pm to 5 pm. This age-old Vedic practice is known for spiritual and cleansing and is carried out using mantras from Sukla Yajurveda. In addition to purifying the area, the ceremony will aid in fostering a spiritually uplifting atmosphere for the day’s activities. Highlights of the Day: Shri Ram’s Prasad, that’s regarded as a celestial blessing, will be offered all day long to devotees from early morning hours reflecting Bhagwan Ram’s grace. A Year of Record-breaking Footfall Shri Ram Lalla’s Pran Pratishtha has turned Ayodhya into a popular pilgrimage centre. An unprecedented 15 million pilgrims are estimated to have visited Shri Ram Mandir to seek the blessings of Shri Ram Lalla. Temple’s tremendous appeal was highlighted by daily footfall exceeding two lakh people daily during peak seasons like Ram Navami and Deepawali. Due to this massive influx of visitors, Ayodhya is now on par with Varanasi and Tirupati as one of India’s most popular pilgrimage destinations and overtaken both Mecca and Vatican, the two religious centres for faithful Muslims and catholic Christians respectively. Wider road networks, better train connectivity and recently opened Ayodhya International Airport have contributed to the boom in tourism. These advancements have made it easier for pilgrims from all over Bharat and the world to travel to Ayodhya. Economic Windfall Ayodhya has experienced exceptional economic growth due to constant influx of devotees. As per local authorities, the city’s yearly income from tourism-related activities has more than doubled hitting almost ₹4000 crore (approximately half a billion US dollars) in the most recent year – the key contributors included pilgrims’ arrival that has brought in about ₹15,000 crore ($1.8 billion) in tourism-related income. Occupancy rates at local establishments, such as restaurants, motels and guesthouses have increased significantly, surpassing 90 per cent during busy times. Infrastructure Development Realizing Ayodhya’s potential to into a world hub of spirituality, Uttar Pradesh state and Bharat’s central governments has made significant infrastructure investments: Spiritual and Cultural Renaissance Ram Lalla’s return to his abode and birthplace has ignited a cultural revival in Ayodhya. The city is now a thriving centre of faith based activity thanks to regular kirtans, bhajans and spiritual talks. To raise awareness of Shri Ram’s teachings, temple administration has planned a number of events that draw both young people and academics. Shri Ram Lalla’s return to Ayodhya also represents a cultural revival. It has inspired a generation to reconnect with their heritage and rekindled interest in Bharat’s legendary stories. The temple’s exquisite carvings and imposing construction serve as a tribute to the magnificence of traditional Indian craftsmanship. In addition to revitalising millions of people’s spiritual ties, Shri Ram Lalla’s Pran Pratishtha has transformed Ayodhya into a centre for both cultural and economic renaissance. Ayodhya is a living example of transformational power of Hindu faith as the city continues to change, striking a balance between its rich legacy and contemporary goals. While the first year of Shri Ram’s homecoming is significant, this holy place is expected to make even more waves in years to come. (Author is head of operations at Centre for Integrated and Holistic Studies, a non-partisan think tank based in New Delhi)Ayodhya Overtakes Mecca, Vatican in Footfall

Read More
Upholding Harmony: Countering the Threat of Khalistani Extremism in Australia

Upholding Harmony: Countering the Threat of Khalistani Extremism in Australia

Proposed anti-harassment laws by Victoria’s Premier and uneven anti-terror enforcement expose gaps in protecting Indian diaspora communities, especially Hindus from Khalistani & Islamists. Triveni Kaul  Australia prides itself on being a vibrant multicultural society, celebrating diversity and fostering harmony among its communities. However, recent incidents involving Khalistani extremism have disrupted this balance, targeting Indian and Hindu diaspora. The emergence of such extremism poses a grave challenge to Australia’s social fabric and raises urgent questions about the safety of vulnerable communities within this framework. Addressing this issue is critical to preserving Australia’s inclusive ethos and ensuring justice for those affected. Over the past few years, Khalistani extremists—advocates for a separate Sikh state carved out of India—have amplified their activities in Australia. While they claim to pursue political objectives, their actions have often crossed into the realm of harassment, vandalism, and violence, disproportionately affecting the Indian and Hindu diaspora. These incidents demand immediate attention to safeguard the multicultural ideals that underpin Australia’s identity. Australian Indian/Hindu Diaspora Indian Australians, particularly Hindus, have increasingly found themselves at the receiving end of targeted attacks fueled by Khalistani extremism. Reports of temple vandalism, such as the defacement of iconic Hindu temples in Melbourne earlier this year, have sent shockwaves through the community. Graffiti glorifying separatist leaders and slogans promoting violence have not only defiled sacred spaces but also instilled a sense of insecurity among devotees. Harassment and intimidation tactics have extended beyond physical locations to digital spaces, where diaspora members have faced online abuse and threats for expressing their views. Community leaders have reported incidents of individuals being followed, heckled at public events, and receiving threatening messages for opposing extremist narratives. The psychological toll on victims, compounded by fears of escalating violence, has been profound. The most alarming aspect of these challenges is the sense of alienation it fosters. Many Indian Australians feel let down by the lack of decisive action to address their grievances, raising concerns about equitable protection within Australia’s multicultural framework. This growing disillusionment risks undermining trust in the system and eroding the social cohesion that defines Australian society. Legal Frameworks Disparity Australia has robust laws to counter terrorism and hate crimes. However, the rise of Khalistani extremism highlights gaps in existing frameworks, particularly in addressing forms of violence that straddle the line between political activism and community harm. Victoria has recently proposed anti-harassment laws aimed at protecting individuals and communities from targeted abuse. These laws, if enacted, could offer a crucial safeguard for diaspora groups facing systematic intimidation. However, critics argue that enforcement will be key, as legislation alone cannot deter well-organized extremist networks. Australia’s anti-terrorism legislation—designed to counter threats from all forms of extremism—provides mechanisms to monitor and prosecute individuals engaging in terror-related activities. Yet, its application has been uneven, with limited cases of enforcement against those propagating Khalistani extremism. This disparity underscores the need for nuanced legal interpretations that recognize the diaspora’s unique vulnerabilities. Recent dialogues between Indian and Australian authorities have signaled a shared commitment to combating extremism. Joint initiatives to curb funding channels for extremist groups, coupled with intelligence-sharing agreements, mark important strides. However, tangible outcomes remain elusive, necessitating deeper collaborations and policy alignment. Policy Recommendations To address the growing threat of Khalistani extremism and protect the Indian/Hindu diaspora, a multi-pronged approach is essential. Key recommendations include: Concluding Observations Targeting of Indian and Hindu diaspora by Khalistani extremists represents a direct threat to Australia’s multicultural values. Proactive measures are essential to protect the rights of vulnerable communities and uphold the principles of diversity and inclusion. Australia’s commitment to multicultural harmony must translate into decisive action against extremism. By strengthening legal protections, fostering community engagement, and enhancing collaborations with India, Australia can ensure that its social fabric remains resilient in the face of divisive forces. Safeguarding the Indian and Hindu diaspora is not just about protecting a minority; it is about preserving the ideals that make Australia a beacon of coexistence and mutual respect. (Author is a corporate professional and foreign affairs enthusiast, she is a contributing writer at CIHS)

Read More
Dangerous Global Bias Goes Unchecked

Dangerous Global Bias Goes Unchecked

Hindu Temples, places of worship, communities in Western democracies and Islamic nations face grave threat and metamorphosed into a huge crisis. Dr Shailendra Kumar Pathak There’s a pattern to it. Hate and violence against Hindu communities has gone global. From Hindu temples, individuals and organizations have experienced extreme violence, vandalism and intolerance. These acts and incidents of violence have been reported in continuum with no respite to Hindus that seek to practice their faith in peace or live the Dharmic way propagating peace, tranquility and provide hope to humanity that’s under stress. From Brampton and Mississauga in Canada to Bangladesh where scores of temples have either been vandalized or closed down ‘by force’, Hindu minorities have been at the receiving end.  Khalistani terrorists, jihadists to Christian evangelists have targeted temples and places of worship even in Bharat that’s home to over a billion Hindus.  Most disturbing is that these violent incidents that totaled to over 300 in last few months went largely unnoticed or unreported. Intolerance is something that’s common to most of the violent incidents. For instance, on November 3 in Brampton, Canada, aggressive Khalistani terrorists attacked Hindu mandir in Brampton as practicing Hindus lined up for peaceful worship and Indian government representatives were busy verifying documents of elderly Sikhs and Hindus to ensure continuity in payment of pension back home. Devotees were beaten up, harassed, roughed up and pushed around violently while the Canadian police played dumb and deaf. It’s not an isolated incident. Mississauga Hindu temple was also vandalized with anti-Hindu graffiti and intimidation of extreme variety.  On November 12, 2024, Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) released a comprehensive report documenting a series of attacks on Hindu communities around the world underscoring the need for attention to what many see as an escalating crisis. VHP report for 2024 documented hate crimes and attacks on temples in several nations like Canada, United States, United Kingdom, and Australia. Sharp rise in hate crimes targeting temples, cultural centers, and individuals has sent shock waves globally among 1.4 billion strong hindus spread across about 100 countries. In Canada, multiple Hindu temples faced attacks over the year including desecration of Gauri Shankar Mandir in Brampton and BAPS Swaminarayan temple in Windsor, which were both defaced with anti-Hindu slurs. United States temples in New Jersey, California and Texas vandalized and practicing Hindus harassed and defacement that included hateful messages specifically targeting Hindu beliefs and symbols were reported. This disturbing pattern suggests that these incidents are not random but part of a broader anti-Hindu agenda that is spreading in Western democracies. In United Kingdom, similar wave of anti-Hindu violence has been reported. Just last year, Leicester, a city with large South Asian population, witnessed intense anti-Hindu violence. Hindu homes, businesses and temples were attacked as mobs chanted slogans against the community, forcing Hindu families to stay indoors in fear. VHP’s report underscore that incidents like these signal an emboldened campaign against Hindu communities in societies that have long prided themselves on tolerance and inclusivity. Australia, too, has not been immune to this wave of hostility. The VHP’s November 2024 report documents attacks on Hindu temples in Melbourne where Hindu symbols were defaced with graffiti linking Hinduism to unrelated political disputes. This graffiti, filled with hateful rhetoric, was intended to shame and intimidate the Hindu community. Such acts reflect a deepening Hinduphobia that is no longer limited to casual prejudice but has manifested into violent, organized attacks on religious and cultural symbols. For Hindus living in these Western democracies, these incidents are betrayal of the promise of freedom and equality. VHP’s comprehensive report also highlights a dire situation for Hindus in neighboring Islamic countries including Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan where the situation is far more severe. In Pakistan, targeting Hindus has reached what some activists call protracted genocide. Hindu temples are routinely desecrated or destroyed, often with little to no response from authorities. Hindu girls, particularly in Sindh, face an alarming risk of abduction, forced conversion and marriage to much older Muslim men. VHP’s report included recent cases of Hindu girls being forcibly converted, torn from their families and left without any recourse for justice. Such violence and intimidation have become daily reality for Hindus in Pakistan where systemic discrimination allows these crimes to go largely unchecked. In Bangladesh, Hindus are staring at total erasure. VHP report notes that in early August 2024 in a span of five hours more than 50 attacks were recorded on Hindu homes, temples and businesses across various districts in Bangladesh. In places like Feni and Dinajpur, Hindu temples were desecrated and homes looted. Reports indicate that mobs of hundreds gathered to burn Hindu homes and assault community leaders as witnessed in multiple Bangladeshi districts such as Khulna, Satkhira and Bogura. This wave of violence has drawn international attention, as videos of the attacks went viral on social media showing mobs surrounding Hindu households, desecrating temples and forcing residents to flee their homes. VHP’s extensive list of incidents in its November 2024 report illustrates alarming scale and frequency of these attacks. It emphasizes that this violence against Hindus often has ideological backing, particularly from radical Islamic factions or Khalistani extremists which justify hostility toward Hindus under religious pretexts. VHP draws attention to anti-Hindu sentiment driven by certain missionary groups which promote aggressive conversion agendas in South Asia. This dynamic, the VHP argues, reveals that anti-Hindu prejudice is not only pervasive but systemic, fueled by a mix of religious and cultural biases. Equally concerning is general lack of accountability or response. When Hindu temples are attacked in Canada or Australia, political leaders and media outlets often remain mute spectators contrasting sharply with the swift response seen for crimes against other communities. This discrepancy has led many within the Hindu diaspora to question double standard practiced in international houses in reporting hate crimes. VHP has noted that Hinduphobia remains underreported and misunderstood, even as acts of Hindumisia (hatred for Hindu beliefs and practices) rise steadily. Unlike Islamophobia or anti-Semitism which are widely

Read More
Yunus is Lying, Plain and Simple

Yunus is Lying, Plain and Simple!

Bangladesh government has no plausible explanation for Hindus exodus while jihadists and jamaatis have a field day. Vinod Kumar Shukla The person who would have been in jail serving life time in Bangladesh on graft charges was hurriedly acquitted by Bangladesh’s anti-corruption commission  after his sworn in to run an interim government. Sheikh Hasina’s unceremonious ouster was reduced to a brief item in most media coverage on turn of events in Bangladesh. The Commission acquitted Muhammad Yunus, head of caretaker government and 13 others from corruption charges. Had Yunus been found guilty of money laundering charges, he would have been in jail for life. The caretaker government freed Jashimuddin Rahmani, the chief of Ansarullah Bangla Team (ABT), an al-Qaeda-affiliated terrorist outfit. And, Mohammad Yunus is making desperate attempts to speak from the high podium with teachings on good neighbour etiquette to India. In the melee, Hindus in Bangladesh faced a tricky situation with a government that took the lead in unleashing terror on her own minorities. Backing from Democratic White House till Kamala Harris bit the dust in recent US elections lent credibility to the genocide of Hindus in Bangladesh front-ended by Jamaatis, army, civil police and para-military forces. The government mandated to protect Hindus lives, property, jobs and honour was not just turning a blind eye but went on a denial mode by saying that reports of attacks on Hindus and other minorities were exaggerated. This lie has been repeated from August 5, 2024 when the then Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina was forced to flee in view of students’ protests actually orchestrated by radical Islamist organisations. Yunus not just downplayed attacks on Hindus but claimed that violence against minorities “only in some cases” and most complaints were “completely exaggerated”. Yunus ascribed  political angle to attacks are more of politics rather than acting against jihadist elements that unleashed terror on Hindus, Budhists, Jains, Christians, Ahmadis and other minor groups of colour. His opined that attacks against Hindus was more political and on afterthought said that such reports were more exaggerated. On the contrary, Bangladesh government has taken an anti-Hindu stand notwithstanding that jihadists have had a free run. Atrocities on Hindus post-August 5 is reminiscent of direct action by Mohammad Ali Jinnah, first Governor General of united Pakistan that began from Noakhali in Bangladesh killing thousands of Hindus. Hindus had been subject to persecution by Islamists in the region from pre-independence days asurping their basic right to live with dignity. Islamists were very strongly poised even in erstwhile East Pakistan but after Bangladesh Liberation war they had gone underground albeit for a very short period. Testimony to this is that Hindus who made up 22 per cent of Bangladesh’s population in 1971 and 29 per cent in 1947 were reduced to about 8 per cent of 17 crore population. Genocide on Hindus continued in full glare and was not hidden from anyone except that Yunus who apparently doesn’t read newspapers and listen to scholars of his own country. One scholar predicted way back in 2016 that no Hindus would be left in Bangladesh in 30 years if current rate of “exodus” at 632 people from minority community leaving each day continued.“The rate of exodus over past 49-years point in that direction,” Dr Abul Barkat, a Dhaka university professor had said in 2016. If things were hunky dory for Hindus in Bangladesh as Muhammad Yunus is trying to portray, there’s no plausible explanation for continued and enhanced exodus. One needs to reflect as to why Taslima Nasreen was forced to flee Bangladesh for writing Lajja that documented killings, rapes, conversion and capturing properties of Hindus in Bangladesh. In the present context, Sheikh Hasina was big hurdle in giving free run to jihadists in whose hand Muhammad Yunus seems to be playing along. Big questions therefore loom large before Muhammad Yunus. As chief of interim government, does he have anything to say about an Islamic song being recited at a Durga Puja gathering in Chittagong?  Was the case filed in connection with the incident?  Were reports on arrest of two people by his government fake? The incident occurred on September 26, 2024 at Durga Puja celebration at JM Sen Hall in Rahmatganj area of the city. Insaf Keemkari Chhatra-Janta, a radical Islamic group, staged a protest in Dhaka against use of playground by the Hindu community for Durga Puja celebrations. There were many instances where Aarti and Bhajan were not allowed and organisers of Durga Puja were threatened with dire consequences. In certain cases, immersion Durga idols were not allowed in flagrant violation of basic right to practice one’s ‘faith’. On September 19, 2024 violent muslim mobs attacked Buddhist Chakma and Hindu Tripuri communities in Dighinala and Khagrachhari Sadar in the Chittagong Division of Bangladesh. They set fire to over 200 shops and homes belonging to the minority groups. The Muslim mob also attacked a Buddhist temple and carried out an arson attack in which many people were killed. Some of the deceased identified were 20-year-old Junan Chakma, 60-year-old Dhananjoy Chakma and 30-year-old Rubel Tripura. Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi on August 15, expressed hope that the situation in violence-hit Bangladesh would return to normal soon and said 1.4 billion Indians were concerned about safety of Hindus and minorities in the neighbouring country. President-elect Donald Trump appointed Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence (DNI) in his administration and often condemned the atrocities against Hindus and other minorities in Pakistan and Bangladesh. This could be one factor for Yunus trying to whitewash the hundreds of crimes committed against Hindus and minorities. Social media is replete with instances of attacks on Hindu villages, houses, temples and many other installations. The minority Hindu population faced vandalism of their businesses and properties, as well as the destruction of Hindu temples. They were forced to resign from government jobs. And, it was irony that Yunus urged them to protest as citizens of the country with equal rights and not as Hindus. Bangladesh Hindu Buddhist Christian

Read More

Guardians or Bystanders!

Canadian police remain mute spectators to violence and vandalism unleashed in Hindu temples by Khalistani extremists backed by Trudeau. Rahul Pawa On a quiet Diwali weekend, two temples in Canada, long-standing beacons of peace for Hindu diaspora became flashpoints of violence. In Brampton, at Hindu Sabha Mandir where a towering 55-foot statue of Lord Hanuman stands in majestic repose, sanctity of worship was violently interrupted.  In Surrey, around same time, similar desecration played out but with an unsettling twist: Canadian police, rather than offering protection from violence, reportedly turned their back on the very devotees they are sworn to safeguard. This spiraling saga of aggression against Canada’s Hindu community speaks of growing dissonance, one in which Anti-hindu allegiances and violent extremist ideology have found combustible alignment. These events call into question not Canadian authorities role in preserving peace and apparent lack of justice in face of rising extremism against Hindus. The incidents bear markings of a broader issue that Canada under the guise of neutrality may have dangerously fueled. Hindu Sabha Mandir in Brampton stands as a symbol of spiritual and cultural unity for Hindu community with its towering Hanuman statue —serving as proud reminder of ancient heritage in Canadian landscape. Yet, as Indian consular officials visited the temple to offer routine services, scenes of unrest unfolded that shattered the temple’s tranquility. Khalistani extremists, aligned with banned Sikhs for Justice extremist group, staged a violent protest that devolved into open aggression against temple-goers. Video footage shared across social media captures harrowing moments as Hindu devotees were set upon, beaten, and confronted with huge sticks by extremists. Aggressive violence by these extremists was unprovoked assault on peaceful community engaged in their sacred observances. Sikhs for Justice, a group with known links to Pakistan and history of terrorism linked to violent Khalistan secessionist movement had explicitly voiced their desire to disrupt consular services outside official premises, claiming these events posed a “threat” to Khalistani cause. Peel Regional Police, responsible for overseeing law enforcement in Brampton, have faced sharp criticism for their response or lack of it. Widespread violence notwithstanding, no arrests were made, a decision that many say reflects a worrisome leniency. Peel Police released a brief statement pledging to “investigate any acts of violence or threats,” yet to date, no charges have been filed. This inaction starkly contrasts with the force’s rapid response to similar instances of disorderly conduct in other communities. For Hindu Canadians, these events highlight troubling trend. Liberal MP Chandra Arya condemned the incident, calling attention to what he described as “free pass” given to Canadian Khalistani extremists. As he noted, “These extremists receive a degree of immunity that raises serious questions about Canada’s commitment to protecting its citizens equally.” Across the country in Surrey, a gathering of Hindu devotees at a temple similarly faced intimidation from Khalistani extremists operating with impunity in Canada. As people of all ages congregated to pray, the Khalistanis arrived with charged slogans, invoking Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a notorious Khalistani extremist recently slain under murky circumstances. Far from remaining a peaceful protest, the event quickly turned menacing, with calls for Hindus to “go back to their country.” Yet what unfolded next is perhaps more disturbing than the protest itself. As tensions escalated, members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) intervened—but not to protect the threatened Hindu worshippers. Instead, in an act that has left the Hindu community in shock and disbelief, RCMP detained three Hindu devotees who were then escorted from temple grounds in full view of the protestors who had incited the incident. The reason for these detentions remains undisclosed, but the message it sent was clear: the victims of intimidation were cast as the culprits. This police action has left many questioning the RCMP’s impartiality. At a time when Hindus in Canada felt increasingly vulnerable, police response was inadequate or complicit. The pattern of law enforcement intervening against Hindu Canadians, rather than protecting them, has fostered deep resentment and fear. A local temple spokesperson pleaded for calm, reminding the community to await further information but the undercurrent of fear was palpable. Canadian authorities’ seeming unwillingness to protect Hindus or even acknowledge the intimidation they face revealed a chasm in the justice system they are meant to trust. Indian High Commission in Ottawa released a statement expressing disappointment at the violence allowed to mar routine consular events. “As in previous years,” the statement read, “the High Commission and Consulates General of India have planned consular camps during this period to assist local life certificate beneficiaries.” However, despite clear forewarning and requests for heightened security, Canadian authorities failed to prevent Khalistani disruption. This dereliction of duty has left Hindus in Canada and beyond questioning the nation’s dedication to ensuring safety for all religious communities. Diplomatic tensions sparked by Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau between Canada and India have simmered in recent months, with baseless accusations fueling discord. Yet Canada’s handling of these incidents hints at something more insidious— normalization of extremism under the guise of free speech. It appears that Canada is struggling, or perhaps choosing not to confront, a deeply ingrained bias in its approach to law enforcement where Khalistani sympathisers were concerned. India’s high commission has been left with few choices but to remind Canadian authorities of their duty to protect citizens and consular staff engaged in routine activities. The community they represent, however, feels abandoned, exposed to aggression with no recourse to justice. As Canada’s Hindu diaspora reflects on these violent episodes, an unsettling reality emerges: their homeland may be an ocean away, but the conflicts it faces seem to have followed them to Canadian shores. Devotees who once sought refuge in Canada, a country that promised peace and safety, now find themselves targeted, harassed, and abandoned by a system that seems unwilling to defend their rights. In these attacks, there is bitter irony—Canada’s celebrated multiculturalism, once source of pride, has been weaponised against the very people it claimed to protect. As Canadian authorities continue to walk the line

Read More